It feels like a step towards making the urban area into a bigger city, conceptually: the ARTM is suggesting a certain unification of transit services – not quite a merger, but bringing the STM, RTL, STL and Exo closer together to better orchestrate their services, and in doing so save money.
It wouldn’t be painless – a lot of people must have their own fiefs in those organizations and won’t give them up without a fight. But it’s probably a sensible direction to take, given the big change in transit use since the pandemic, and the need to readjust services around the REM.
Meantime, the Caisse de dépôt’s idea of making money by exporting the REM concept elsewhere – I’d forgotten this was even a thing – has received no response at all. Despite some smoke and mirrors here, I suspect there’s nothing so revolutionary about the REM that other cities would be incapable of coming up with to suit themselves.
H. John 10:33 on 2023-03-03 Permalink
Maybe the City should just do its job.
This is a workplace safety issue with the Union calling for things as simple as better lighting in some parking lots.
The law seems more than reasonable. As the Tribunal’s decision in Jan. 2022 explained:
“Il appartiendra à l’employeur d’identifier les facteurs de risques applicables à ses établissements et de déterminer si des mesures humainement logiques et raisonnables peuvent avoir pour résultat de les contrôler et de les éliminer. S’il en existe, il lui appartiendra de les mettre en place.”
This case has been in front of the Tribunal since 2018.
Kate 11:33 on 2023-03-03 Permalink
The impression given by the article was that fixing this problem would be a very big deal – not something as simple as adding some lighting.
I agree that police agents are under a heavier kind of risk than most of us, and deserve to be able to get to and from work without putting themselves in danger. But what do other cities do about this problem?
H. John 15:40 on 2023-03-03 Permalink
This hearing process, which started in Nov. 2018 before this Tribunal, is based on findings of the CSST which the City ignored.
I haven’t read this latest decision. SOQUIJ should have it by next week, and I’ll track it down and add more detail.
The Jan. 2022 decision was clear that the Union called a number of experts in the field, and tabled a list or table of what other cities do. The Tribunal affirmed the May 2018 report from the CSST, declared that the City did not respect its obligations under art. 51(5) of the Loi sur la santé et la sécurité du travail.
But, it gave the City six months to:
L’employeur doit utiliser les méthodes et techniques visant à identifier, contrôler et éliminer les risques pouvant affecter la santé et la sécurité des travailleurs en relation avec l’aménagement des terrains de stationnement et des voies d’accès des postes de police relevant de son autorité. Un délai de six mois lui est accordé pour procéder à l’analyse de risques et décider des correctifs à apporter s’il y a lieu.
steph 16:21 on 2023-03-03 Permalink
Maybe the cops can take public transit. (I feel like this thread is a deja-vu)