A court order has banned pro‑Palestinian protests on the McGill campus for ten days.
A regular reader sent me some clarification: demonstrations:
- Must not block or obstruct the entrance to any building
- Must not engage in protests within five metres of any building
- Must not obstruct the delivery or performance of academic activities
But they aren’t banned outright.
I would have thought those normal demands at all times?



The lawyers will obviously go over the contract, which we can’t read, but in general unless you have an inflation clause or a cost plus clause or a generous force majeur clause, you don’t get to not fulfill your fixed price contract or demand more money just because your costs rose. If you promise to do a thing for $100 and you think it’ll cost you $85 and you can get $15 in profit, but then costs go up and now it’s $95 or $105, well too bad, you take a loss. The park here should either force the contractor to finish the contract (specific performance) or sue for damages (liquidated if they exist). If the contractor goes bankrupt, well tough, bid better next time. And certainly no government should ever use them again. Enough socializing the losses or low bidding and then asking for more money later.
Also it’s really funny that one of the contractors said they don’t consider there to be a legal case as of yet, so they won’t comment. It’s usually the opposite. I guess they’ll never comment.