Updates from July, 2025 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 18:40 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

    Mohammed Abdullah Warsame, who told people at the Old Brewery Mission last month about his intention to set off explosives on Montreal public transit, was formally accused of terrorism Monday by federal prosecutors, who used a criminal code provision that’s never been used before in Quebec to heighten the seriousness of the consequences.

    Warsame is a Canadian citizen originally from Somalia, and has done time in the U.S. over his support of Al‑Qaida.

    CityNews makes the legal position a little clearer: the Attorney General granted federal prosecutors permission to pursue the case as a terrorism-related offence.

     
    • Ephraim 08:02 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

      Citizenship can be revoked in Canada for hiding support of a terrorist group. Citizenship Act (RSC, 1985, c. C-29) under Fraud or Misrepresentation and National Security Threats and Serious Criminality. It’s what is supposed to allow us to remove anyone who is a supporter of the Islamic state, Hezbollah, al-Qaida, Hamas, the Houthis, Nazis or others. Two cases come to mind Helmut Oberlander and Branko Rogan. There is also the case of Zakaria Amara, who the Liberals changed the law and his citizenship was reinstated even though he was convicted of terrorist acts in Canada, who is now on parole and back in the public. Not sure how I feel about that case… 17 years in jail, parole and then watching him for the rest of his life as an expense, when we could have deported him back to Jordan.

    • bob 11:58 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

      This case smells of bullshit. The contention that a homeless guy (who seems more than a little detached from reality) has the wherewithal to construct an IED is goofy. I tend to think his name popped up on US law enforcement radar, some calls were made, and the RCMP chimed in at their behest.

      The case against him in the US had its own barnyard aroma. He pled guilty to a lesser charge after being held in prison for five and a half years, four of them in solitary confinement. The prosecution never had to actually prove a case, and what was alleged was practically de minimis.

      More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Warsame

    • Kate 12:50 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

      Warsame’s homeless and doesn’t seem to have a posse, but the fact that he would be technically incapable of sparking the kind of havoc he described presumably doesn’t invalidate his intention to do terrorism.

  • Kate 17:47 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

    Sunday broke a record, the temperature reaching 34°.

    For comparison, it’s 16° now.

     
    • MarcG 07:36 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

      It’s really becoming clear that we broke it (and have no intention of trying to fix it).

    • Mozai 12:25 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

      I feel like I’m in that classic scam: I’m in an antique shop, someone distracts me, and in the same moment a vase precariously balanced falls and shatters on the floor. Then the shop owner convinces me I’m the one who broke it, and demand I pay for it or else.

  • Kate 13:39 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

    Projet Montréal has announced their candidate for mayor of VSMPE, Jean François Lalonde, described as an expert in local economic development.

     
    • Kate 11:35 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

      Another debate percolating through the media is about the issue of prayer rooms at Dawson and Vanier, and whether they upset students. La Presse’s Léa Carrier found that the recent government report making this claim ignored a recent study that bears directly on the question.

      You know what it is. The CAQ, especially Pascale Déry, want students to feel unsettled and unhappy about the prayer rooms, so much so that she can’t imagine they’re not an issue. That would give the government a premise to exert more control directly on the two CEGEPs.

      After all, it must be a fact now, it’s in a government report.

       
      • Tim S. 12:17 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        I’m heartened to see La Presse is on the case, and that it’s the top story there.

        The way the government is making stuff up about students – 17, 18 year olds – in order to justify it’s own prejudices is stomach-churning, and I hope everyone who’s smug/concerned about what’s going on in the US is paying attention to this story.

        To be clear, my concern is not about prayer rooms. It’s about the government making stuff up and then giving those lies official status. There’s a term for it that escapes me at the moment – information laundering?

      • Kate 12:43 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

      • bob 13:37 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        I really don’t know why we continue to indulge the glaring racism of these “secularists”, or the CAQ and PQ and other rank hypocrites with their histrionic conniptions when people comment, quite correctly, about systemic racism in Quebec.

        @Tim S. The term for that is “lying”.

      • Ian 18:43 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

        Manufacturing consent for “secularism” does sound more palatable than “imposing ethnonationalist norms”.

    • Kate 10:00 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

      Our media are conducting a civil, quiet debate on whether it makes sense to keep constructing high‑end residential units on the “trickle‑down” principle. Maxime Bergeron examines a luxe skyscraper going up in Griffintown where rent for a one‑bedroom is currently quoted at $1810 (possibly more by the time the complex opens). His doubt of the theory is apparent in the piece.

      On the weekend, 24hres has a piece with the flat statement as a headline: Voici pourquoi construire plus ne règlera pas la crise du logement, with an expert saying nothing has proven that adding more units at the high end eventually benefits those who must find more affordable places to live.

      You know what it is. No real estate developer wants to construct modest apartments – where’s the profit? So they have to put it out there that by developing at the luxe end, they’re effectively making more modest units available. It’s bullshit, but it’s convenient bullshit – for them.

       
      • bob 13:44 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        It kind of shows that something other than a free market is happening when the supply and demand curve no longer applies.

      • Blork 15:59 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        As I mentioned in a comment about this topic last week, the “trickle down effect” makes sense if you’re just constructing a simple logical syllogism, but in the real world there are many complications that throw wrenches into the logic.

        Things like GREED and HUMAN NATURE and STUPIDITY all throw wrenches. And there is plenty of all those things going around. Yet the simple syllogistic logic endures, because it is simple and easy to understand, and easy to quote, even if it’s not realistic.

        Such are the foundational bricks of neoliberalism laid. (Also for most “-isms,” really.)

      • DeWolf 17:40 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        This is why we need non-market housing. Not just for the destitute but for everyone who can’t afford a luxury apartment. More co-ops, more programs like AccèsLogis – which was cancelled by the CAQ in 2023.

    • Kate 09:44 on 2025-07-07 Permalink | Reply  

      La Presse observed the tourism office in Old Montreal and saw the range of questions posed in the course of a day.

       
      • CE 18:47 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        These offices are very important for visitors and there is now only one (the other office, at Dorchester Square, closed a few years ago). There should be one back in that area and another in the QdS imo.

      • Kate 18:53 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        I didn’t realize they closed the Dorchester Square office.

        This page says there’s also one at 1442 Clark Street on the Esplanade Tranquille from May till October.

      • DavidH 19:21 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        @CE, Quartier des Spectacles has one now. It’s on Esplanade Tranquille inside the pavillion where you can rent skates in the winter.

      • CE 20:45 on 2025-07-07 Permalink

        The one at Esplanade Tranquille is Bonjour Québec who provide tourism resources for all of Quebec although it’s possible that they are now providing resources for Montreal as well. Back when they had a kiosk on Ste-Catherine, they were very focused on the regions outside of Montreal and would direct you to Tourism Montreal for city related inquires. I’ll have to drop by to see if they’re helping tourists in the city now too.

        I didn’t realize how many mobile teams they have now. My experience with them has been a bit mixed though.

      • Kate 09:44 on 2025-07-08 Permalink

        Thanks, CE. Typical if the Bonjour Québec office is at pains to direct people out of Montreal to the regions.

    c
    Compose new post
    j
    Next post/Next comment
    k
    Previous post/Previous comment
    r
    Reply
    e
    Edit
    o
    Show/Hide comments
    t
    Go to top
    l
    Go to login
    h
    Show/Hide help
    shift + esc
    Cancel