The theoretical $36B REM de l’Est would not link directly downtown and would not be in service till 2036. There was an interesting comment here on the last REM post, which is worth reading.
La Presse’s Stéphanie Grammond considers the huge sum – which she estimates would reach $50B when all the bills come in – compared to other needs in Quebec.



DeWolf 16:44 on 2023-07-04 Permalink
Based on that comment, the ARTM is actively trying to sabotage transit in Montreal. How can you have effective regional transit without grade-separated systems? You can’t.
(The comment also makes it sound like ARTM leadership is deeply insular, bigoted and racist, which isn’t a surprise.)
jeleventybillionandone 18:24 on 2023-07-04 Permalink
The racism bit in that comment is completely baffling to me, assuming the comment is reliable. Can someone unpack this attitude for me? Why will tramways make Montreal great again? Why is grade-separated transit only for sh*thole countries?
DisgruntledGoat 18:40 on 2023-07-04 Permalink
The original grade separated REM de l’Est proposal for 2029 completion and $10 billion is looking like a better deal and missed opportunity more and more every day.
Now transit to the east of the island is bogged down in the usual bureaucratic infighting and won’t happen.
I still remember all the public consultations with NIMBYS complaining, and all the hang-wringing on this blog about an affordable green transit solution “cleaving the urban fabric of the city”. Gimme a break.
Kate 18:46 on 2023-07-04 Permalink
I still don’t think it would’ve been a good idea to run an elevated train on René‑Lévesque.
Spi 19:46 on 2023-07-04 Permalink
That’s great Kate, now we have a still ugly R-L just with no transit. The ARTM has lost all credibility when it comes transit planning, they’re ok with dumping all the extra downtown bound ridership on to the green line because their logic is that the green line won’t reach capacity until 2050. So knowing that construction projects are always delayed by several years and that ridership numbers often undercount the peaks there’s a very real possibility that if this project materializes it would on day 1 max out the peak capacity of the green line, but hey the downtown segment was a doubling of service that wasn’t needed.
The shortsightness is astounding.
Anton 09:20 on 2023-07-05 Permalink
A comically bad proposal doesnt make a weak proposal better, at least in absolute terms. Then again, I dunno, maybe it does. Montreal transit seems like a lost case these days.
One thing that’s annoying is that people never demand good solutions, because everybody knows this is impossible here. Ppl just accept garbage, because at least its not shit.
bumper carz 14:10 on 2023-07-05 Permalink
Tramways are the way to go for mid-density suburbia, and if these surface transit vehicles slow down cars or take away lanes… so be it.
Andrew Weitzman 22:36 on 2023-07-05 Permalink
I know that elevated rail isn’t all that nice…but for eff’s sake, 36 billion for a completely underground version that doesn’t even provide downtown connectivity vs. a 10 billion CDPQ-Infra plan that does (well, let’s tack on 1-2 billion for the inevitable surpises) is a flamingly bad deal. Just run a Calgary-style high floor stadtbahn tram-train system for the ARTM route.
Forgetful 11:15 on 2023-07-06 Permalink
Andrew, nobody builds high floor tram systems anymore. Calgary, many European cities, and even German cities are either retrofitting lines for low floor rolling stock, or if they stick to high floor they upgrade the line to metro. There’s a lot of reasons for the switch to low floor, some good and some bad, but a lot of it is seemingly driven by aesthetics unfortunately.