Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 23:05 on 2026-05-18 Permalink | Reply  

    The Canadiens won their series in overtime but the Victoire will need to play a further match.

     
    • Tim S. 23:44 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

      Lots of honking out here by the highway

  • Kate 17:41 on 2026-05-18 Permalink | Reply  

    Premier Fréchette gave Emmanuel Macron a Canadiens sweater in Paris on Monday. CTV’s headline says Macron nonetheless didn’t support Montreal for the defence bank HQ, but the text says nothing about this. La Presse, however, gives the details.

     
    • Kate 12:54 on 2026-05-18 Permalink | Reply  

      A big march is planned for the Journée nationale des patriotes, not downtown, but cutting through Rosemont.

      Later, reports from Radio‑Canada and CTV.

       
      • CE 13:58 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

        I’m not sure if it was the same one but I saw a smallish march on Laurier earlier today with lots of Quebec and Patriote flags. It was mostly a younger crowd and had an odd, angry vibe.

      • A 22:54 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

        It’s not the same one, the one on Laurier was a bunch of racists flying their flags

    • Kate 11:03 on 2026-05-18 Permalink | Reply  

      The Tailor of Alexandria sounds like a John le Carré title, but actually it’s a real man plying a traditional trade here in Montreal. Nice profile on Radio‑Canada.

       
      • Kate 09:54 on 2026-05-18 Permalink | Reply  

        Top story on most platforms Monday is the day’s dual hockey tournaments – the Victoire one win from taking the Walter Cup, the ultimate prize in the Professional Women’s Hockey League, and the Canadiens one match from either winning the series against the Sabres, or hanging up their skates for the summer.

         
        • MarcG 13:05 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          Pretty funny quote in Patrick Déry’s latest newsletter about Habs fever: “Never have temporary immigrants and unilingual Anglophones been so popular in Quebec”

      • Kate 21:15 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

        The Portuguese religious procession went ahead Sunday in the Plateau as it has for many years, in silence – a fact that may have skirted the law against praying in public.

        There was also a march against homophobia and transphobia Sunday downtown.

         
        • Nicholas 22:17 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

          Gotta ban silent prayer by asking everyone what they’re thinking at all times.

        • PatrickC 22:23 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

          The silent procession will be spun as proof that the law works. That the borough’s compliance may have been ironic will not have any shaming effect.

        • steph 23:06 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

          Might be the best way to go about it -no permit but a wink and a nod.
          What’s Quebec going to do – send in the SQ?

        • Joey 05:27 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          It’s really a shame (unless I’ve missed something) that the city’s various religious organizations aren’t jointly encouraging their congregants to collectively advocate against this law – a lot of the reaction to the Portuguese procession understandably emphasizes how the community has been a pillar of the Plateau and city for decades. It does not, it seems, express a lot of solidarity with other religious Montrealers (especially the unstated target of this law, the Muslim community).

          This isn’t a criticism of the Portuguese, who have the burden of being one of if not the first major community to be affected by this law, but emphasizing the uniqueness of the Portuguese (or Jewish or whatever) community concedes one of the also unstated ideas underlying this whole nonsense, which is that some communities are to be encouraged, some are to be tolerated, and some are to be, let’s say, discouraged.

        • azrhey 11:52 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          oh as Portuguese, the community reaction is really gross and one of the reasons I don’t hang there that often besides getting some groceries now and then. The racism and discrimination against the Muslim communities has been outrageous. Like there were people saying they didn’t think the law should apply to Catholics just to those foreign religions and what not.
          I got into an argument with other Portuguese locals on a Facebook group and there were a few of us saying that we should show solidarity for all religions if we wanted our stuff to be accepted but we were definitely in the minority. Much shame.

        • Kate 12:28 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          I’ve seen nothing about a concerted voice among the active religions here, but it’s quite the idea. A single voice to counter the Quebec law. But you know what would likely happen – they’d bicker more among themselves than unify to speak with one voice.

        • Kate 12:30 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          Some people are still fighting the Crusades, or trying to drive the Saracen out of Al‑Andalus.

        • Chris 14:21 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          Why would we expect a concerted voice from theists? Many of them think they are absolutely right, and the others are heathens, believing in the wrong god. They are not allies, they are enemies. (Not all of them, obviously; but enough of them that I would not expect any concerted action.)

          Joey, regarding your last sentence, it’s not necessarily wrong to treat different communities differently. For an extreme example, if religious community X requires human sacrifice, and religious community Y requires pacifism, shall we treat them the same? Some religions are simply worse than others. I ask you honestly: would you rather a world of strictly interpreted Islam, or a world of strictly interpreted Jainism?

        • Kate 17:47 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          Chris, the rules of both Islam and Jainism, interpreted strictly, would be harsh if imposed on people, but you miss the subtlety that, here in Canada, nobody is obliged to practise a religion. In fact it’s practically a confessional genre for people to write about how they, as second generation immigrants, began to peel away from the beliefs of their family.

          Anyway, that’s neither here nor there for the purpose of this thread.

          I would love to see the Catholic Archibishop, the top local clerics from the Anglican and United churches, the most prominent imams and rabbis, whoever is in charge of the Buddhist, Hindu and Sikh temples, all sit together and craft a letter to this Quebec government tearing a piece off them for this repressive and stupid law. And I am a disbeliever myself, but you can no more impose rationalism on an unwilling population than you can religion.

        • jeather 20:33 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          Remember you are only supposed to say merry Christmas if you are thinking about Santa (who we pretend is not religious) and not Jesus.

          And yes, we treat religious communities X and Y the same. Murder is against the law for people in either community; unusual food practices are allowed. Maybe we give both of them parking variances for their specific holidays, or let their children reschedule exams, even though the holidays are different days.

        • H. John 23:52 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

          @Kate My guess is that it went ahead because the provisions in Bill 9 were only passed a little over a month ago, and municipalities are still figuring out how it applies.

          Like most bills, provisions at its end set the date(s) that it comes into effect; and parts of the Bill only come into effect September 01.

          Silence would not skirt the law. They didn’t forbid “praying”, they forbid “religious practice” (which obviously can include praying).

          Here’s the definition they use for religious practice:

          “Any action, except the wearing of a religious symbol, that may reasonably constitute, in fact or in appearance, the manifestation of a religious conviction or belief, is a religious practice within the meaning of this section and
          section 10.2.”

      • Kate 18:38 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

        A recent survey shows that Quebecers are still turning their backs on the U.S.A. and vacationing closer to home.

        The Journal lists Montreal’s seven major attractions, the seven treasures of Quebec City, some curious places to stay and some quaint Quebec villages, although the huge banner promoting Air Canada flights to Japan is undermining the effect somewhat.

        Monday, La Presse looked into who’s still visiting the U.S. and why.

         
        • Kate 15:52 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

          Two groups of people who became overebullient Saturday night – and not because of hockey – were suppressed by police after fireworks were set off. Nobody has been arrested.

           
          • Kate 11:38 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

            Premier Fréchette is said to be trying to round up Emmanuel Macron in an effort to get that defense bank headquarters for Montreal. Le Devoir, on the other hand, was not sanguine about Fréchette’s visit to France.

             
            • Kate 10:00 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

              Sunday, May 17, this city marks 384 years as a European‑style settlement established on the island of Montreal. Happy anniversary!

               
              • Kate 09:39 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

                cat reading newspaperQuebec politics always offers possibilities, Côté poking fun at Québec solidaire, while both Ygreck and Chapleau spoof PSPP’s paranoia. Côté’s and Ygreck’s nervous fonctionnaires watch the launch of the digital health record, Côté’s horrified patient reading his chart.

                Québec solidaire proposed a tax on the ultra rich, but the response of François Lambert was the thing that activated the cartoonists. Côté has a dry comment on the wiliness of the wealthy.

                Trump in China was an inevitable target as he tried to eat a burger and open a fortune cookie. He also tried to part the Strait of Hormuz.

                As Mark Carney approves pipelines, Steven Guilbeault sees the mask come off.

                 
                • Kate 09:28 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

                  Rents in Montreal have risen by 70% over ten years. The Gazette blames “population growth, gentrification and a game of catch-up with other markets” in the deck to this piece, the first of a two‑parter, but it doesn’t note the utter failure of the TAL to keep rents reasonable.

                   
                  • Joey 09:40 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Feels like they are setting up the next instalment in the series to deal with the public policy failure here (which includes, but is not limited, to the TAL’s conduct).

                  • Kate 10:41 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    I find the mention of “markets” also tone deaf. If you live in Montreal it doesn’t help you if the “market” in some other city is “more competitive” or whatever. You work here, you live here, the rental situation is what it is, it isn’t a “market”. You can’t easily pick and choose between global cities like buying veg in the market. Must everything be seen in the language of business college?

                  • steph 11:15 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    At least the Montreal market comes with higher salaries…. right? right??

                  • Nicholas 16:24 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Yes, disposable income is higher in the Montreal area than it is in the rest of the province. Urban area agglomeration effects make this a standard pattern worldwide that big cities (and suburbs) have higher incomes than small cities and rural areas. Whether it’s enough to counteract higher housing costs varies, but it absolutely did not surprise me that incomes are higher here before actually checking.

                  • Kate 16:39 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Higher than the rest of Quebec maybe, but seen from a global point of view, not so much.

                  • Chris 17:16 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Wait, what? Montreal/Quebec/Canada absolutely have higher wages, income, wealth, and disposable income than the global average (or median). Surely I’ve misunderstood what you’re saying?

                  • Kate 17:20 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Context, Chris. Do you really think the Gazette was comparing Montreal’s market with Port‑au‑Prince or Lagos? If you look at our income levels compared to London, Paris, New York – even Toronto or Vancouver – they’re lagging, while our rents catch up to these bigger and more prosperous cities.

                  • Chris 18:59 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    Kate, I see. But still, you can’t just exclude the places around the globe that are poorer, and point to the remaining and say ‘see, they’re all richer’.

                  • Kate 19:16 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    If we’re “playing catch-up with other markets” – the direct quote I plucked from the Gazette – that isn’t going to mean poorer cities, is it. By implication it means places where things are more expensive.

                  • qatzelok 21:59 on 2026-05-18 Permalink

                    Most commercial media is tethered to the landlord classes so they are likely to suggest that there is no alternative to what we have now.

                    It’s working out great for the people who fund commercial media.

                • Kate 09:21 on 2026-05-17 Permalink | Reply  

                  A police car was set on fire downtown early Sunday, and the Canadiens hadn’t even won a game. Nobody got hurt in the blaze.

                  There were a lot of people downtown Saturday night, and there will be a lot of people for the watch party at the Bell Centre on Monday.

                   
                  • Chris 10:42 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    “hadn’t even won” is quite the understatement. 🙂

                  • JP 15:09 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                    I was walking to the McGill REM around 9 pm…It was soooo quiet outside walking down McGill College. If you didn’t know it was a hockey game night…you would have thought there was nobody downtown….

                • Kate 20:34 on 2026-05-16 Permalink | Reply  

                  La Presse has a possibly useful list of summer festivals.

                   
                  • Kate 09:22 on 2026-05-16 Permalink | Reply  

                    The West Island branch of the REM opens for a free preview Saturday and Sunday till 6 pm.

                    Agitation for a branch to the east end of the island is only bound to grow now.

                     
                    • Uatu 12:52 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      As someone who grew up in the South Shore, the idea of taking one train from Brossard to the West Island is pretty amazing

                    • Kate 13:09 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      I think you do have to change trains at Bois-Franc, no?

                    • LJ 13:21 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      No, you just need to board the right train from Brossard, so the A3 line rather than the A4. If you board the wrong line you can transfer at Bois-Franc. I have already taken the REM downtown and back from the Kirkland station twice, and it is fantastic (assuming it does not break down, I guess). Unlike taking the EXO commuter rail with its very limited schedule, we can now leave and return at any time from 5:30 AM to past 1 AM. A long-awaited game changer for those of us who prefer public transit to cars.

                    • Kate 14:14 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      Excellent, LJ. Just as I had assumed you couldn’t take a single train all the way from Brossard to Deux‑Montagnes – I thought it meant changing at Central Station – I was mistaken here too. A3 to the West Island, A4 to Deux‑Montagnes, and – when completed – A2 to the airport.

                      Too bad I never need to go to these places, but I may have to take the REM as a jaunt this summer just to see it all.

                    • LJ 14:42 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      Not much to see as the downtown portion runs underground and the rest is rather bland unless you like industrial rooftops. The stops from Sources to L’Anse a L’Orme are elevated so you can get an overview of that part of the island, but it is not exactly spectacular either. So useful transit but not very touristic. May be worthwhile to see a few stops once. At least it is quick, you can go from downtown to the end of A3 and back in about an hour.

                    • Kate 14:54 on 2026-05-17 Permalink

                      I’ve only taken the REM for one stop – McGill to Édouard‑Montpetit. Basically a metro ride. But I do want to take it across the bridge sometime soon, since I have not been on the new Champlain yet. I’m also vaguely interested in walking around Île Bigras. So my idea was to take a day off this summer, buy an all-zones ticket, and just go have a look around.

                      As I’ve noted here before, if only from looking at the placing of stations and their surroundings, the majority are simply plunked down near a big parking lot, and not much else. They’re mostly not intended to be walked to and from, but rather driven. So – as you say – not very touristic, and no pressing reason to get off the train for a look around most of the stations.

                  c
                  Compose new post
                  j
                  Next post/Next comment
                  k
                  Previous post/Previous comment
                  r
                  Reply
                  e
                  Edit
                  o
                  Show/Hide comments
                  t
                  Go to top
                  l
                  Go to login
                  h
                  Show/Hide help
                  shift + esc
                  Cancel