So much for dreams of the Cup.
But the Victoire will have a hockey celebration Saturday.
So much for dreams of the Cup.
But the Victoire will have a hockey celebration Saturday.
City hall is putting aside $3.4 million to help people left homeless on Moving Day. But then you read that it’s $1.1 million per year for 3 years, and that will get thinned out by incidental expenses.
Man, is it raining hard over here, with incidental thunder, just as the Tour la nuit gets started nearby at Jarry Park.
I’ve even put out a bucket to catch rainwater for some of my plants that aren’t directly rained on, so I can water them later without turning on a tap.
Bike path counters, which were turned off in March, are back on again now. With a link to the city page showing the locations and the numbers since 2022.
No idea why Karim Benessaieh didn’t explore this more:
On note cependant de grandes différences entre les données fournies par la nouvelle plateforme depuis 2022 et celles d’Éco-Compteurs. Le nombre de compteurs et de passages enregistrés diffère chaque année, avec un écart pouvant aller jusqu’à 3 millions de passages en 2022 et de plus de 1 million en 2025.
Yes, I thought the change being made was for other reasons besides the claimed ease and cheapness. Something is up.
The city is asking us to reduce water consumption this summer while it repairs a water main under Atwater which is at risk of breakage at the same time two other major mains in town are also down for repairs.
La Presse includes a map – basically, more than the entire eastern half of the island is concerned.
The city will be closing some park fountains and limiting road washing and plant watering. We can only hope we don’t get any heat waves this summer.
i find it the height of montreal irony for plante and projet to be the first administration in decades (maybe a century) to decide to bit the bullet and finally fix the damn leaking/exploding water mains and spiff up the streets/sidewalks at the same time – and then get electorally punished for doing the hard but right thing.
That right there is why most administrations don’t put money and effort into maintenance and repairs, even when the need is urgent. They’d rather keep kicking that can down the road till somebody else has to take the electoral hit.
“En moyenne, chaque Montréalais consomme 306 litres d’eau par jour, ce qui dépasse la moyenne canadienne de 220 litres par jour.”
I don’t think that’s true.
Well, in some sense, it’s impossible to know for certain if it’s true because Montreal doesn’t have water meters; we only know for sure how much water is going out. However, it is known that people in cities without water meters consume much more water than those in cities that do.
(Many years ago, I took a class that spent a week on Montreal’s water and sewer systems. It’s unclear to me if this is still true, but another reason it was almost impossible to know how much more water Montrealers consumed than their peers was that it was very roughly estimated that the city was losing half of its water to leaks.)
“A complete ban on watering could even be considered eventually”. Strange that they suggest this before suggesting, I dunno, a ban on washing cars, or spray-cleaning driveways, etc. Living things must die before we inconvenience car culture!
The CTV piece does say:
R T : Apparently the leaky water mains are good for the city’s trees.
Indeed I didn’t read all 4 links, but now I’ve read the CTV one too. Seems the bylaws are explained a bit here: https://montreal.ca/en/articles/regulations-concerning-water-use-what-you-need-to-know-16578 Spray cleaning a driveway seems already disallowed.
But even the CTV article ends with “Depending on how the situation evolves, officials note that additional measures may need to be implemented, including a watering ban.” So here too they threaten plants before banning car washing.
The water main in question was installed in 1984. The fact that it already requires emergency repairs should be scandalous. Water mains are generally expected to last at least 60 to 70 years. For perspective, the current work on rue de la Cathédrale, mentioned in the article, is replacing a water main that dates back to 1911.
The massive main that burst in August 2024 at the corner of de Lorimier and René‑Lévesque was installed in 1985. Possibly some bad engineering decisions about materials or methods were being made around that time, but it was reported earlier this month that it still isn’t clear what went wrong there – or maybe somebody knows but isn’t saying.
Friday night will be the Tour la Nuit, and Sunday the Tour de l’Île. Notes on streets to be closed for the cycle events and for any other reasons.
Weekend notes from Le Devoir, CityCrunch, Journal de Montréal, CultMTL.
It isn’t a new story that a lot of social housing units are in disrepair, nor is it news that many school buildings are in such poor condition that they can make kids sick.
One of the authors of the school report asserts that “the root cause of the education system’s crumbling infrastructure is that governments didn’t invest enough in maintaining schools over decades.” You think maybe?
“Education Minister Sonia Lebel believes the province is already investing enough in education.”
Which I assume is true because surely her kid(s) are in public schools, right?
I’ve been waiting for an education-related topic to post this petition:
https://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/exprimez-votre-opinion/petition/Petition-12243/index.html
Deadline is June 4 and there’s only about 11K signatures so far.
Key notes:
Data indicates a marked decline in book purchases by schools and libraries in 2025, representing approximately 250,000 fewer children’s books;
in a context where we wish to strengthen literacy and graduation rates, protect the French language and Quebec culture, and mitigate the effects of overexposure of young people to screens, access to books in schools is essential…
It’s shameful citizens have to beg the CAQ to invest in something as basic as book and basic infrastructure.
Please sign and share.
Signed.
Quebec is delaying funding for STM projects while bank charges pile up fruitlessly.
It’s weird the story keeps using “frais bancaires” when the quotes use “frais financiers” and “financement à court terme”. Bank fees read to me as overdraft, which obviously isn’t happening to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. They’re paying interest. And because these are short term loans by the STM, rather than long term loans issued by the province, the interest rate is surely higher. But at least they can make the budget deficit look artificially lower during an election year.
Hey what’s that school funding story just above about?
Buried at the bottom is the news that this kind of thing is no longer possible – basically projects were being approved at all levels but financing was held back for reasons… which meant that transit agencies had to borrow to finance the early stages until the full funding came through. Except that:
“De nouvelles normes de comptabilité dans le secteur public s’appliquent à la STM depuis avril 2024. Celles-ci n’autoriseraient plus le début des travaux avant les approbations officielles, comme c’est le cas du côté fédéral.”
In other words, rather than just allocate the money upfront with the other approvals, projects will be completely delayed until the mysterious budget-allocation process is complete.
Nicholas 10:49 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
Does anyone think a Cup celebration for the Habs would be three measly blocks long on an already pedestrianized street?
Kate 11:48 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
It would obviously be much bigger but possibly also cause more damage.
Chris 13:37 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
Of course a Habs parade would be bigger, why wouldn’t it be? They have more fans, more history, and are better players. Remember the NHL is not a men-only league, there just aren’t any women good enough. If the Victoire players were, they should surely prefer the salary boost being with the NHL.
Kate 14:39 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
Chris, you’re usually better at trolling than this.
The reason we separate many sports into men’s and women’s formats is because men are, on the whole, larger, they benefit from the effects of testosterone on their musculature, and their mature structure differs in that – again, on the whole, this is speaking of generalities – women’s pelvises are shaped for childbirth, not so much for strength and speed. See Wikipedia on sex differences in human physiology for more on all of this.
We don’t pit men and women against each other in most sports because it’s apples and oranges. The best apple will never be an orange. This is also why there’s still debate about allowing trans women to compete as women in sports. Anyone with a Y chromosome who has matured as a male is going to have – on the average, again – a natural advantage over a similarly average XX person born as a woman.
Chris 14:58 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
Trolling!? I’m of course well aware of everything you said, and agree with it, and it doesn’t contradict anything I said.
Kate 16:19 on 2026-05-30 Permalink
They are “better players”? Women are not “good enough”?
The Habs collapsed, and the Victoire did not.
mare 13:11 on 2026-05-31 Permalink
*”This is also why there’s still debate about allowing trans women to compete as women in sports.”*
Trans women don’t compete *as* women, they *are* women.
(I won’t go into the whole trans sport ‘debate’ since this is a blog about Montreal. But the difference between trans women’s bodies after a few years of HRT, and cis women’s bodies is not as cookie-cutter clear as you state in the rest of your comment.)
jeather 15:43 on 2026-05-31 Permalink
There are sports where women will regularly beat men — there was some mixed shooting sport in an Olympics where a woman won so suddenly there was only men’s shooting, ultra distance runs and swims, climbing routes that are about flexibility or balance vs brute strength. If we dealt with sports that required flexibility and endurance more than strength and speed, we’d see women winning, but for various reasons we don’t.