Fatal crash in Lasalle
A young driver died overnight when he lost control of his car and it crashed into a tree in Lasalle. His passenger is in hospital. No mention of damage to the tree, but there never is.
A young driver died overnight when he lost control of his car and it crashed into a tree in Lasalle. His passenger is in hospital. No mention of damage to the tree, but there never is.
Ian 00:01 on 2025-04-27 Permalink
In the subterranean root system where they all talk to each other you know they’re giving high fives to this buddy
dwgs 15:02 on 2025-04-27 Permalink
I know we don’t care much for cars around here but a family is mourning his loss. Sounds like he was driving too fast but a life is a hell of a price to pay, maybe don’t joke about it.
Kate 18:06 on 2025-04-27 Permalink
Fair enough, dwgs. Sorry. But don’t blame Ian, I gave him the opening.
Ian 06:30 on 2025-04-28 Permalink
It’s always a good time for a very serious scolding. I know it’s been a while, might I suggest solving this problem with clowns?
dwgs 07:23 on 2025-04-28 Permalink
You’re all class Ian.
Ricardo 07:36 on 2025-04-28 Permalink
wow, young person dies tragically, bloggers make lame jokes. uncool.
Ian 07:46 on 2025-04-28 Permalink
I live to serve, gentlemen. Don’t fall of that high horse, you might hurt yourself.
Kate 09:08 on 2025-04-28 Permalink
I actually wasn’t trying to be funny.
Nicholas 18:43 on 2025-04-29 Permalink
There was a case over a decade ago where a rotten tree on the edge of Westmount fell onto a car on Cote des Neiges and killed the driver, and the family hired Julius Grey to sue the city and its insurer, Lloyd’s, said that it’s a motor vehicle accident so covered under no fault insurance. Case was appealed to the Supreme Court, but the city/insurer and the SAAQ won, even though Grey and the family said it shouldn’t count because a pedestrian killed in such a way could sue. Obviously there’s no one to sue if you crash into a tree, but it’s interesting how wide “motor vehicle crash” is legally.