Updates from December, 2025 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 19:18 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

    A water main broke near the Palais des congrès late Monday afternoon, closing several streets.

     
    • Kate 19:17 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

      The ARTM plans to hike transit fares an average 3% in mid 2026.

       
      • Kate 19:16 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

        The CSN released its worst employers list Monday, with Amazon at the coveted #1 spot – but with Renaud‑Bray at #3, the STM at #4 and the Quebec government at #5.

        I looked for the full list, but while the CSN has a piece announcing the existence of the list, it doesn’t link to it either.

         
        • MarcG 08:07 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

          I did a little searching and my impression is that the list is a “top 5”.

        • Nicholas 10:23 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

          Presumably this is CSN’s view of the worst unionized employers, as I assume they think non-unionized employers are even worse.

        • steph 10:52 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

          Amazon is a non-unionized employer.

        • dhomas 10:55 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

          Amazon was, very briefly, a unionized employer. The union was “totally not the reason” Amazon pulled out of Quebec. I think this would land them in the top 5 worst employers (or bottom 5?) for a union list.

      • Kate 15:36 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

        Already an open and closed item for the holiday period.

         
        • Kate 14:32 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

          Emergency wards are overwhelmed even though flu hasn’t peaked yet.

           
          • MarcG 19:36 on 2025-12-22 Permalink

            May I recommend this article by Dr. Lyne Filiatrault: Don’t wait for B.C. public health to protect you this flu season.

          • Kate 20:41 on 2025-12-22 Permalink

            I’m definitely seeing more masks around again lately.

          • MarcG 08:23 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            I feel sad and disappointed when I see people wearing surgical masks. It’s as if public health was promoting the pull-out method against pregnancy in 2025 because there was a condom shortage in 2020. Here are some excerpts from the FDA’s page on the subject:

            “While a surgical mask may be effective in blocking splashes and large-particle droplets, a face mask, by design, it does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. Surgical masks also do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants because of the loose fit between the surface of the mask and your face.”

            “An N95 respirator is a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles. Note that the edges of the respirator are designed to form a seal around the nose and mouth.”

          • bob 10:44 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            Wearing a mask is not supposed to protect you from the world, it is supposed to protect the world from you.

          • MarcG 11:29 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            bob I think that’s misinformation leftover from 2020. Respirators are engineered to filter the air the wearer breathes in (as well as filtering their exhalation, unless the mask has a valve). When a worker is installing fiberglass with one on, do we think they’re protecting the pink batting from getting sick?

          • Ricardo 11:47 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            I read that and I think: Aren’t emergency wards always overwhelmed ?

          • MarcG 12:05 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            Yes they are but it’s worse now (e.g. The Royal Vic ER is often at 100-150% stretcher capacity and it’s currently at 227%). Something else to remember is that hospital staff are human – they get sick and can’t work, too – making it a double-whammy.

          • Kevin 14:35 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            N95s are better than procedure masks which are better than not wearing a mask at all.

            Transmission isn’t an all or nothing affair, and every step you take to protect yourself and others reduces the odds.

          • MarcG 15:10 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            And the pull out method works about 80% of the time, but I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen it in a box at the entrance to a reproductive health clinic.

          • jeather 10:32 on 2025-12-24 Permalink

            That’s about the same rate as typical use for abstinence. (Perfect use is much better, but it’s very rare.)

          • MarcG 07:49 on 2025-12-26 Permalink

            jeather, I doubt you’ll see this but I’d really like to understand what you’re saying, because it sounds to me like abstinence is only 80% effective against pregnancy – seasonal virgin-birth joke?

        • Kate 10:48 on 2025-12-22 Permalink | Reply  

          Maxime Bergeron looks at blunders the city has avoided, including the tower Jean Drapeau wanted to put on top of Mount Royal and the highway that nearly ran right through Old Montreal.

           
          • Ian 13:14 on 2025-12-22 Permalink

            The Milton Parc soviet-blocks-turned-luxe is such a rollicking tale of idealism quickly turning to greed, it’s such a blessing htat people were able to organize and prevent that project’s fruition.

          • Kate 15:41 on 2025-12-22 Permalink

            It’s time we named something after Blanche Lemco for saving Old Montreal from becoming a wasteland like the spaces under and beside the Met.

          • Joey 10:43 on 2025-12-23 Permalink

            Maybe we could rename a pedestrian street in Old Montreal after her.

        c
        Compose new post
        j
        Next post/Next comment
        k
        Previous post/Previous comment
        r
        Reply
        e
        Edit
        o
        Show/Hide comments
        t
        Go to top
        l
        Go to login
        h
        Show/Hide help
        shift + esc
        Cancel