Updates from April, 2026 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 21:35 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

    The landlord who owned that building in Old Montreal where seven people died in a fire in 2023 has had his law licence suspended. He’s facing manslaughter charges.

     
    • Kate 19:21 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

      An amateur boxer who killed a man with a single blow two years ago at the Orange Julep has been sentenced to five years, the judge having felt that Ismail Karaoui’s training meant he knew what he was doing.

       
      • Kate 18:06 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

        Patrick Lagacé writes about how Montreal dodged a bullet when Quebec decided not to back a bid for some of the matches in this summer’s FIFA World Cup.

         
        • Kate 15:19 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          New federal money is coming to support a legal clinic in St‑Michel meant to support Black people fighting systemic racism, which is interesting given the official Quebec position that there is no systemic racism in Quebec.

           
          • Blork 17:59 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Is that the official position though? Or is it just Legault-my-Eggo’s personal opinion posing as official position? (Asking sincerely, as I don’t actually know…)

          • bob 18:59 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Oh great. More Quebec money appropriated by Ottawa for nothing!

        • Kate 15:15 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          Alexandre Boulerice, MP for the central Montreal riding of Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, and sole remaining NDP MP in Quebec, has announced he’s switching to provincial politics and joining Québec solidaire. QS had to make an exception to their rule about only women or nonbinary persons being accepted as candidates in ridings they currently hold. He’ll be running in Gouin, which more or less overlaps his federal riding, currently held by Gabriel Nadeau‑Dubois, who announced last year that he wouldn’t be running again.

           
          • Chris 17:26 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Thus confirming that stuff is but woke virtue signaling.

          • Kate 17:33 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            What does that even mean, Chris?

          • bob 18:52 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            If the NDP does not retain the seat there will be no NDP MP east of Winnipeg.

          • Ian 18:53 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            I’d ask about all the Montreal conservative ridings but there are none.

          • bob 19:02 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            @Kate Equity rules have been dispensed with simply because they have a star candidate. There has been much discussion about this within QS and QS-adjacent circles.

          • Nicholas 19:06 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Also the sole remaining NDP MP east of Manitoba, which will be the second time this has happened since the NDP’s founding, after 1993-1997.

            What Chris means is that the party has firmly held principles that they stand by until it’s inconvenient.

          • Ian 19:44 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Is it? He says “woke” a lot when talking about anything left of Nixon.

        • Kate 09:07 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          The Boston Globe looks admiringly at the ways Montreal has repurposed so many churches unwanted for their original purpose.

           
          • Josh 11:27 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            archive dot ph links haven’t loaded for me in months. I guess it’s just me?

          • MarcG 11:38 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Works for me. Do you get a specific error message? Do you use a VPN? Have you tried clearing your cache?

          • Meezly 12:51 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Maybe you’re a robot?

          • Josh 13:30 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Not a robot, I promise! It just times out for me and I’ll get a message saying the site can’t be reached.

          • John B 14:33 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Are you using an alternate DNS provider? I think they don’t work with 1.1.1.1 or something like that.

          • bob 17:21 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Try a mirror:

            archive.today
            archive.fo
            archive.is
            archive.li
            archive.md
            archive.ph
            archive.vn
            archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion (that’s for TOR)

          • Chris 17:27 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Josh, it’s been intermittently flakey for me too.

        • Kate 08:58 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          CDN-NDG borough planned to add parking meters around Sherbrooke Street, but an angry backlash from motorists forced them to scale back the plan.

           
          • Joey 09:31 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            A backlash championed by Projet Montréal! There was an American bureaucrat named Rufus Miles, who in the late 1940s who coined the phrase, Where you stand is where you sit – i.e., your role in a system largely determines your point of view. When you sit in opposition, you wind up standing up for free parking, even when your political identity is disproportionately informed by your deeply held belief that civic life has already ceded far too much power and subsidy to drivers.

            Anyway, this sounds like the right call.

          • Mark Côté 09:32 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            As noted earlier in this blog, Councillor Peter McQueen, an avid cyclist to say the least, really whipped up opposition here, which is very interesting.

            Also interesting, I live near the Terrebonne bike path, and fear of loss of parking sparked my neighbour to start a petition to get permit parking for our street. After the bike lane was added, it in fact did not turn into a parking apocalypse… but there’s now permit zones on our street a few thousands more dollars a year in city coffers.

          • Joey 11:06 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            When I lived in Griffintown 20 years ago, the residents started to mobilize for permits, since parking was pretty sparse and lots of people would park for free and then walk downtown, especially when events were happening at the Bell Centre. From what I recall, the city has a pretty comprehensive process to determine whether permit parking is appropriate for a neighbourhood, involving some fairly significant data collection. I’ve wonder if given the ‘parking catastrophe’ overreaction to the Terrebonne bike lane, the city fast-tracked the process.

          • Ian 12:08 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            I heard McQueen talking on the radio and his angle did not seem “angry backlash from motorists” in the least, he was more concerned with people parking on the main strip of Westmount for too long, limiting parking availability for the people just trying to go to shops or whatever which is what that strip’s parking is meant for – and these meters would not help that issue at all, represents unithinking overreach, and a one-size-fits-all attitude that McQueen does not want to be associated with. Citing “angry backlash from motorists” is reductionist and does not do justice to the issue at all.

          • Joey 12:22 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Huh? If people are parking on a busy commercial stretch of road for too long the solution is 10000% to charge for parking. Is McQueen arguing the opposite? My understanding was that there actually isn’t too much of a short-term parking crunch in that area and that this was just clearly a cash grab from the borough.

          • Ian 18:57 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            I expressed that poorly, he meant on the busy strip of Sherbrooke between Decarie and Victoria there SHOULD be these parking meters but the rest of the strip didn’t need them, and putting meters along the rest of the strip is the part that doesn’t help and is overreach etc. And yeah, a cash grab especially on the residential streets.

        • Kate 08:56 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          The clock is ticking to pass a law to allow for the development of the Blue Bonnets site into 20,000 residential spaces, half of them social or “affordable”.

           
          • jeather 10:21 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Has there been a related update in Cavendish? I’ve been told that the initial agreement required opening up Cavendish before they were allowed to build residentially.

          • dhomas 12:21 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            I remember reading about the Blue Bonnets development and Cavendish extension. Somehow, they were lumped together at the time. But I don’t really see why the Cavendish extension should be a prerequisite to building out the Blue Bonnets site. It seems to help Cote-St-Luc more than any future residents of the Blue Bonnets site.

          • jeather 12:37 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            I think it had to do with reducing traffic on Decarie. We know that extra highways doesn’t reduce traffic, but I think that was the argument when they were tied together.

          • Kevin 12:41 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            The Cavendish connection is required because the Jean-Talon/Decarie intersection operates at somewhere around 400% capacity.

            The rail lines force all traffic between Highway 13 and L’Acadie-Park to funnel through Decarie.

            The idea is that Cavendish would allow heavy trucks to make more than one trip per day.

          • jeather 12:42 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            Ok I searched there’s a petition that says:
            WHEREAS, in 2017, the Quebec government transferred the Hippodrome lands to Ville de Montréal for $1, in order to build housing on the following condition: Art. 5.2.3 The Cavendish-Cavendish link is a road that falls under its [Montréal’s] responsibility, and it undertakes to include it in the agglomeration’s transportation plan and its three-year capital program;

            Fun detail is that Martinez Ferrara was pro opening up Cavendish when Projet stopped moving forward on that, so I’m looking forward to all the angry responses from supporters when they also don’t do it.
            https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/federal-government-invests-hippodrome-housing-2026-1.7633967

          • Chris 17:31 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            > The Cavendish connection is required because the Jean-Talon/Decarie intersection operates at somewhere around 400% capacity.

            and it will go down for a little while, then be right back up at 400% before you know it.

          • Kevin 18:46 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            There is induced demand, latent demand, transportation changes caused by improved individual economic situations, and then there are poorly designed roads.

            The Decarie-Jean Talon interchange is a chokepoint because of the train yards, as anyone can see by looking at a map. That is aggravated because it’s a region with three competing jurisdictions, and choices made by the city of Montreal interfere with choices made by the province. It’s not helped by choices made by TMR.

            Things can be built better, as we’ve seen with Turcot: Decarie south to the Ville Marie used to have bumper to bumper traffic all the way back to Queen Mary but that was eliminated by doubling the lanes on the ramp going to downtown.

            Decarie and Jean-Talon needs another big change. (I’d go with moving the northbound on and off ramps to eliminate the criss-cross of people trying to turn right on Jean-Talon blocking people trying to get on the highway, for starters. Until then a Jersey barrier isolating the righhand lane on Decarie Blvd. from under the tracks to Jean-Talon would be awesome!)

            But the first thing is to bite the bullet and spend hundreds of millions on an unsexy connection so that people in Montreal West, NDG, Hampstead and CSL can go north without being forced onto Decarie, and so big trucks can make the round trips from their factories to Blue Bonnets multiple times a day without being stuck in the 24/7 jam that is the Decarie Circle.

            Then the city can spend an equal amount of money on building a sewage system, and then build houses and even a tramway to Namur metro if they so desire.

            But we’ve been through 4 mayors since everyone was told that nothing happens without Cavendish. Nothing else is an option. Quit pretending something else can happen.

        • Kate 08:50 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          Following its decision to make workers come to the office three days a week, the city has renewed two expensive downtown office space leases, a move the civil servants’ union frowns on after they were told things are very tight, going into negotiations for their new contract.

           
          • jeather 10:19 on 2026-04-24 Permalink

            This does seem like a great argument for the union. And though I don’t begrudge it, I resent that we’re going to pay for the rent and then the raises that will be forthcoming.

        • Kate 08:44 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

          weekend notesWeekend notes from La Presse, Le Devoir, CityCrunch, the Gazette, Journal de Montréal, CultMTL.

          CultMTL also offers a spring arts calendar.

          Weekend road closures and driving issues.

           
          • Kate 08:38 on 2026-04-24 Permalink | Reply  

            After a long wrangle, the province’s medical specialists have approved a new deal with the government.

             
            c
            Compose new post
            j
            Next post/Next comment
            k
            Previous post/Previous comment
            r
            Reply
            e
            Edit
            o
            Show/Hide comments
            t
            Go to top
            l
            Go to login
            h
            Show/Hide help
            shift + esc
            Cancel