Police shot someone overnight in Ahuntsic‑Cartierville and it’s being investigated by the BEI. No more specific location is given.
Meantime, a member of the SQ elite squad against organized crime shot himself in the hand Friday morning in the secret clubhouse of the Escouade nationale sur la répression du crime organisé.
Jean-François Roberge says that Go Habs Go and “Go Canadiens Go” are acceptable. The STM hasn’t said whether it will change back.
Top guns all around
évidament ça fait partie de notre patrimoine!
But Shirley there’s an exception! Is a terrible system of government.
https://medium.com/@scottconnerly/the-shirley-exception-a970ef292d66
This has been fun, at least it’s hit fewer international outlets than Italian in an Italian restaurant did.
Weekend notes from CultMTL, CityCrunch and La Presse.
Driving restrictions of the weekend.
The Île aux Tourtes bridge will be closed all weekend but will reopen with all four lanes operating on Monday.
A house in Ahuntsic (100, rue Somerville) once occupied by the Iraqi consul to Montreal, and which has stood empty for more than 30 years, will finally be demolished. Twenty‑four trees on the lot are also to be cut down.
Oh, interesting. I have wondered what that place was, that explains it. Weird place for a diplomatic property but it is awfully pretty up thataway.
Many years ago I jumped the fence with a friend and explored the house. It was partially burnt but was interesting for its indoor swimming pool that seemed to be in the living room. I always carried a digital camera back then so I must have some photos somewhere.
All the houses on the river side of Somerville Street should be moved to join the two waterside parks they interrupt. A linear park with ecological functions would be an excellent replacement for this example of very poor urbanism.
A park? Urbanism? How boring! Why stop there? As long as we’re off-topic & making stuff up, I propose tearing out the entire street, banning people from the area, and rewilding it completely. Phase 1 of everything within 50 meters of the river, all the way around the island.
/s
@CE I’d be curious to see any shots that exist, for sure.
I went down memory lane looking through old photos but unfortunately couldn’t find them (if they exist).
@Ian: “…Urbanism? How boring!…”
Quite the opposite. Go for a walk right now on Somerville and notice how boring the walk is with banal suburban homes blocking views (and access) to a beautiful waterfront.
Other species find the cement flood-walls and lawns-to-the-waterside… boring to the point of extinction.
I did say why stop there … tbh you are describing wetland ecology in the context of a mixed urban environment, I don’t think just “moving” houses across the street (!) is going to sufficiently rewild anything, especially if it’s maintained as a park.
Look at the park around Perry Island, for example, just a few clicks uptiver – there’s very little truly wild space there, even the ducks are wary.
The headline that an ex director of Projet Montréal has been found guilty of electoral fraud sounds serious. Marie Depelteau‑Paquette’s crime is that she did not include overtime pay for campaign workers in 2017 as part of Projet’s expenses, which are limited by law during a campaign.
Depelteau‑Paquette pleaded that she was only following orders – but she’s the one that may have to pay a heavy fine.
I see no reason not to hold hte bosses responsible, too.
Yes, but they were not on trial.
The background to this – who’s ultimately responsible for handwaving the issue or, in fact, who brought it to the attention of the authorities – is not clear, but to me, it’s not crucial enough for journalists to spend time digging into it.
I mostly found the headline a more startling than the story, which is about irresponsible bookkeeping, not targeted fraud.
Fair enough. Just because it wasn’t published doesn’t mean it wasn’t investigated.
The story confused me, but the decision cleared some stuff up, and arguably it’s worse than the story makes it out. I’ll try to summarize, but may make a mistake here or there.
There were four permanent, salaried employees of the party, and during the electoral period they did extra hours. The law says that all expenses during an electoral period should get included, but there are a few exceptions, including regular ongoing expenses for the administration of a party. The DG of PM asked the official agent, the person responsible for all payments and expenses during the electoral period, if these hours should count, and she asked Elections Quebec, who, after some back and forth, said yes. Those employees were salaried, so instead of paying them the party considered giving them time off later, but EQ said both paid and compensated hours counted. The official agent asked the DG for information to include the overtime, at time and a half, as an expense either way, and the DG said that would be fine. Right after the election, they found they had spending room under the limits, but were short on cash (this was 2017, so they weren’t rolling in money). Electoral expenses are partially reimbursed by the taxpayer, as part of public financing, but they must be paid out within 90 days, and without enough cash on hand they might not meet the deadline. The party BoD and, partially, the mayor, said to stop any potential payment and discuss the hours, and that at another board meeting they decided to count the hours as volunteer, at the suggestion of the DG, according to two witnesses. The official agent objected, saying employees can’t legally renounce that compensation, though they then did after the fact. The official agent even paid out of pocket for a legal opinion, beyond that provided by EQ, to confirm she had to include these expenses. The employees still got compensated with time off, that varied based on the number of extra hours that were done, which the judge said showed it wasn’t volunteer hours, even if the time off was taken outside the election period. As well, when the DG went on maternity leave, she told her replacement to hide info about the hours from the official agent, to get one of the four employees to keep two sets of books to both discount the hours officially but count the time off and lastly that the employees taking the time off should do it on days the official agent wasn’t in the office, so the official agent wouldn’t know about the extra time off.
One could argue that things were unclear at the time. But what the judge accepted in her decision was that the official agent tried to get the expenses filed as per the rules given from Elections Quebec and a lawyer she paid out of pocket for advice, and the DG said she would file that but then chose, likely with the encouragement/direction of the board, not to, and to hide the information, likely knowing that was against the law. It may seem as a bookkeeping issue, but given the actions involved, the judge thinks it’s also wage theft and bad faith, intentional circumventing of the law, reporting requirements and other things. And the judge said while others might have been charged, only one was, so she could only rule on that. $5,000 may seem like a lot, but given the specific intentional actions of the DG of the organization, not some low level employee, one could argue the fine and the coverage aren’t disproportionate.
Lastly, to guess at the answer to Kate’s question, Elections Quebec was already aware of the potential for these extra hours when the official agent asked about how to treat them, so when the final report was filed with zero such hours, I’m sure there were questions raised. It could of course have been a tip off from the official agent or one of the four employees, or a board member. I skipped over a few paragraphs of the ruling so I don’t know for sure it wasn’t mentioned, but I didn’t see it.
Thanks for the breakdown, Nicholas. That’s very insightful.
In 2015, McGill University opened its Social Accountability and Community Engagement office in response to a critical report about shortcomings in its medical program. Now, in the cold wind of anti‑diversity, equity and inclusion coming from the U.S., it has closed the office and replaced its three nonwhite workers with one white person.
Later, CTV covered response to this decision.
Police witnessed one man shooting another, early Friday on Ste‑Catherine near Crescent. The victim is in hospital and the attacker was swiftly arrested.
A little later, but still very early, a man was found dead on the esplanade of Place des Arts near police headquarters, as Radio‑Canada emphasizes. He had injuries but no homicide number has been given out because the circumstances are unclear. (TVA suggests that it may be the 10th homicide of the year.)
maxime prati 03:43 on 2025-04-26 Permalink
It was on Boulevard St-Michel corner Fleury…. chaotic for the neighborhood traffic all day.
Kate 09:20 on 2025-04-26 Permalink
Thank you.