I get that it is a gradual process to minimize the visual impact, but this does bring in mind the old joke about the city crew digging a hole and then filling it in again, one by one, because the person whose job it is to plant the trees was sick that day.
Maybe growing up in the country makes me less sentimental about trees but I find people seem to get weirdly emotional about them. I’m not sure how cutting down some old, rotting trees is “carnage.” Even the language in the story is strange. 100-year-old trees are far from “ancient” and cutting down 4.3% of a large park’s trees is definitely nowhere near “clear cutting.”
In the case of Lafontaine, it’ll change the landscape. When a single large elm was taken down in Jarry Park last year it changed a familiar landscape for hundreds of people. Neither park is very heavily wooded – unlike Angrignon or Mount Royal, neither has an area that’s thickly wooded at all. So losing more than 100 mature trees is a big thing.
Ginger Baker 14:33 on 2019-05-23 Permalink
It’ll take 2 yrs to cut down 132 trees, and 6 yrs to plant 200?
What?
How could it possibly take this long?
Mr.Chinaski 14:53 on 2019-05-23 Permalink
Because the new trees will be planted in sync with new projected works that are to be done in the Park every year.
walkerp 15:06 on 2019-05-23 Permalink
I get that it is a gradual process to minimize the visual impact, but this does bring in mind the old joke about the city crew digging a hole and then filling it in again, one by one, because the person whose job it is to plant the trees was sick that day.
CE 15:18 on 2019-05-23 Permalink
Maybe growing up in the country makes me less sentimental about trees but I find people seem to get weirdly emotional about them. I’m not sure how cutting down some old, rotting trees is “carnage.” Even the language in the story is strange. 100-year-old trees are far from “ancient” and cutting down 4.3% of a large park’s trees is definitely nowhere near “clear cutting.”
Chris 14:54 on 2019-05-25 Permalink
CE: a hundred old tree is ancient when inside a city. The average city tree dies much younger.
Kate 08:20 on 2019-05-26 Permalink
In the case of Lafontaine, it’ll change the landscape. When a single large elm was taken down in Jarry Park last year it changed a familiar landscape for hundreds of people. Neither park is very heavily wooded – unlike Angrignon or Mount Royal, neither has an area that’s thickly wooded at all. So losing more than 100 mature trees is a big thing.