Updates from August, 2021 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 18:03 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

    It doesn’t feel like so long ago that the Old Port was spruced up under the direction of Peter Rose and Aurèle Cardinal, but that was the 1990s, and now the Canada Lands Company is putting $50 million into a further sprucing up of the area.

    But, in tune with the kind of problem spotted in the post below on the Mobility Montreal website, the Canada Lands site directs us to the Old Port of Montreal site for further information – but that site spawns warnings about a dead security certificate then apparently has nothing about this new plan.

     
    • PatrickC 18:49 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Seeing the expression “sprucing up” highlighted in your post made me curious about where the phrase came from. Nothing to do with the tree, it turns out. Rather, it’s connected to an old English name for Prussia, which produced a leather used in purses considered elegant at the time. So the handbag obsession goes way back…

    • MarcG 19:43 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Thanks PatrickC, that’s interesting. What did it say about Kate’s usage in the post title/sidebar ‘re-spruced’? 🙂

    • DeWolf 10:32 on 2021-08-21 Permalink

      You can tell it was designed in the early 90s because the amount of space given over to cars is astonishing. The road that runs along the waterfront has been permanently pedestrianized for years but it’s still just an asphalt tarmac with no shade. Replacing it with nice paving stones and planting a couple of rows of trees would go a long way to making it a beautiful place to walk.

      And then there’s the issue of the bike path that suddenly disappears between St-Laurent and the Bonsecours Market…

    • Orr 16:03 on 2021-08-24 Permalink

      If they want to make the Old Port nicer and back to respecting the architectural scale and heritage of the jewel that is Old Montreal, they should get ride of the giant oversized ferris wheel eyesore.

  • Kate 12:51 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

    Radio-Canada says the bridge and tunnel folks will suffer this weekend. Don’t forget Mobility Montreal if you’re gadding about.

     
    • MarcG 15:23 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Homepage->Network Conditions->Major closures->Click learn more button->Screenshot from 2019 of another website the developer must have worked on. Banging my head against the table at the incompetance of QC technology and lack of quality assurance testing. (I spent all day yesterday and today trying to get my wife a “walk-in” clinic appointment on the web, god help us all).

    • Kate 16:44 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Wow, that’s poor.

    • mare 17:04 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Someone forgot there was also an English language website in the brief. But probably no budget to translate and update it. Or the CMS isn’t connected at all to the English version.

  • Kate 11:23 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

    Candidly revealing priorities, the first view of a REM car will be at Place Extasia du Quartier DIX30 later this month, the event being billed as Le REM arrive en ville (but which ville? Also, Place Extasia sounds like a sex shop.)

    After this, Exporail in St-Constant will have a visit from the REM car.

    Nothing here about exhibiting it in town. This ville.

     
    • Uatu 10:30 on 2021-08-21 Permalink

      Funny thing is that square in the dix30 is in the dying part of the mall. The shop owners refer to the street that leads to it as le rue des losers because of the decrease in foot traffic due to more development on the other side from the new Solar condos/square. It’s almost like the REM is rubbing it in their faces.

  • Kate 11:17 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

    I retired my Covid sidebar widget in June. People using the desktop version may notice I revived it yesterday. There were 527 new cases in the last 24 hours.

     
    • Daniel 11:58 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Did I read somewhere that Quebec was going to start reporting cases/hospitalizations/deaths in those who have been vaccinated vs. those who have not?

    • Kate 12:18 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      I haven’t seen that, but it would be interesting. It’s not broken out that way on Santé Québec yet.

    • DeWolf 12:48 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Santé Québec is already doing that on their daily Twitter dashboard:

      https://twitter.com/sante_qc

      Today’s new cases:

      527 new cases
      400 unvaccinated (76%)
      76 first dose only (14%)
      51 fully vaccinated (10%)

      Today’s new hospitalizations:

      5 unvaccinated (83%)
      0 first dose only
      1 fully vaccinated (17%)

      Keep in mind that unvaccinated people account for 25% of the total population, including children under 12.

    • Kate 13:11 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

      Thank you, DeWolf.

    • fred 01:37 on 2021-08-23 Permalink

      can you tell me the testing protocols and the cycle thresholds for these “cases?” can you explain what and where a Furin cleavage site is? they’re establishment robots, morty.

  • Kate 09:56 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

    Jonathan Montpetit ponders the implicit deals Justin Trudeau has made with Quebec and their potential consequences.

    Radio-Canada’s Benoît Chapdelaine talks to two soi-disant “representatives of the anglo community” about François Legault’s strengthening of the French language charter, and the federal government’s apparent willingness to live with it.

    First off, let’s not make Beryl Wajsman an anglo spokesman. He is not. Marlene Jennings at least does head something called the Quebec Community Groups Network, which represents anglo groups around Quebec, and has a Canada logo at the bottom of its web page, despite being openly against Bill 96.

    Secondly, is there an anglo community? The way there’s a Jewish or an Italian or a Haitian community in this town, is there any solidarity among anglophones? I’m half tempted to theorize that a culture without a cuisine can’t have true solidarity…

     
    • Kate 09:30 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

      The city’s executive committee did an accounting exercise projecting that by 2024, the city budget will be more than $7 billion but that there will be a $780M shortfall. No decision has been made yet on how to deal with it, although cutting expenses and getting more money from other levels of government are both on the table.

       
      • Kate 09:05 on 2021-08-20 Permalink | Reply  

        It seems odd that it took the REM de l’Est project to convince Quebec that Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital should stay where it is and have $2.5 billion invested in upgrading and expanding it, rather than constructing a new facility from scratch in a different location. Could it have cost less to build a new hospital and demolish the old one, which was declared dangerously decrepit in 2016? Why is Quebec letting the REM make decisions like this?

        (Here’s a small but instructive example why I do this blog. CBC and CTV both have reports on the proposed enlargement of the hospital but left out the interesting angle about the REM. Often the only way to understand what goes on around here is to read stories from as many sources as possible, because different media are bound to have different perspectives, and mention different details.)

        I’d also note that a big point in the whole premise for building the MUHC and CHUM hospitals from scratch was that new buildings would be more environmentally sustainable, would have facilities suitable for modern technological medicine, would have better ventilation, and in general would be better suited to meeting current standards. Were those arguments valid, and if so, why wouldn’t they apply here as well?

         
        • DeWolf 10:33 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

          It probably comes down to cost. Historically, it has usually been cheaper to knock down an old building and build a new one from scratch than it is to undertake a complicated renovation to bring something up to present-day codes and standards. But demolition and redevelopment is almost always more environmentally destructive because any construction has a huge amount of embodied carbon emissions.

          In the case of the MUHC, I’m pretty sure that if you crunched the numbers, building two entirely new superhospitals was an environmental disaster, especially in the case of the more suburban-style Glen campus, which also involved new roadways. But it would have cost a lot more money to bring the Royal Vic and other old hospitals up to standard.

          In the case of Rosemont, maybe the recent surge in construction costs means it’s finally cheaper to renovate and rehabilitate than it is to build from scratch. I don’t think it would be possible to build an entirely new hospital for less than $2.5 billion.

        • ant6n 11:05 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

          Renovation of poorly located hospital to boost poorly planned transit project. Sounds very Quebec.

        • mare 11:09 on 2021-08-20 Permalink

          @DeWolf Indeed, a new hospital with the amount of beds Maissoneuve-Rosemont hospital has, would certainly cost more, but it could be built to current standards and would be more comfortable for patients (air condition!) and staff alike.

          Retention of staff is a big problem in hospitals, especially during (and after) Covid, and the current work conditions in our old decrepit hospitals (and that’s almost all of them) are not very appealing. But healthcare budgets come out of the provincial coffers and Montreal is the evil metropolis where people are brown, speak English and don’t vote for the CAQ so I don’t have high hopes. Every hospital in Montreal needs millions, even the CHUM and MUHC so they can open unused areas (currently used for Covid patients AFAIK) that they had to keep closed because of budget restraints.

          I’ve been in a few hospitals in Montreal in the past years and also in Ottawa and the difference is enormous. The difference between Montreal and almost every hospital in the Netherlands is just shocking; when I arrived here 20 years ago I thought I had travelled back in time. And not much has improved here since then.
          Some people say I don’t have the right to complain, if it is better there I should just go back. But everyone in the medical system is complaining, patients and staff, and nothing changes. We need to spent enormous amounts of money on health care and education, 100s of billions, especially now after the waiting lists have ballooned and people working in healthcare are worn out after years of pandemic stress. Add the aging population, who live longer but in worse health, and also increased healthcare staff retirement, and the future is bleak. (On top of the bleakness in many other areas.)

      c
      Compose new post
      j
      Next post/Next comment
      k
      Previous post/Previous comment
      r
      Reply
      e
      Edit
      o
      Show/Hide comments
      t
      Go to top
      l
      Go to login
      h
      Show/Hide help
      shift + esc
      Cancel